X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Argued: January 11, 2001

Appeal from a conviction after a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Christopher F. Droney, Judge), to one count of conspiracy to distribute narcotics. Appellant contends that his guilty plea should be vacated as not fully informed because the district court’s description of the government’s evidentiary burden regarding the charges against him was erroneous under the Supreme Court’s subsequent Apprendi decision. We affirm because the facts do not warrant reversal on plain error review.

Donald Mims appeals from his conviction after a plea of guilty before Judge Droney to one count of conspiracy to distribute narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. �� 841(a)(1), 846. Appellant contends that his conviction should be vacated because, when he entered his plea, he was not correctly informed about the law pertinent to the charges against him. In particular, he argues that, in light of the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the district court erred in telling him that the government had to prove his involvement with only a “detectable” quantity of heroin to obtain a conviction by a jury and expose him to a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. We hold that, although the district court’s statement was inaccurate under Apprendi, the mistake was not such as to call for reversal on plain error review. We therefore affirm.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
June 20, 2024
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
June 27, 2024
New York

Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.


Learn More
July 11, 2024
New York, NY

The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.


Learn More

The Princeton office of Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to join its Litigation practice. Candidates should have a minim...


Apply Now ›

Summary Description: Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis seeks a Law Librarian to manage the Firm s information research services and library...


Apply Now ›

Nutley Law firm concentrating in plaintiff's personal injury for plaintiff seeks an Attorney with three or more years of experience in New J...


Apply Now ›
06/14/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/29/2024
The National Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›