Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Green v. Vidlak

The fact that the defendant's name remained in the style of the amended petition did not alter the effect of the omission of her name as a defendant in the body of the amended pleading.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Appellant Kelly Green challenges the trial court’s order that she effectively non-suited her claims for personal injuries against appellee Estella Vidlak when she amended her petition and did not name Vidlak as a defendant. By six issues, *fn1 Green contends (1) a court-ordered amendment should not equate to a voluntary amendment, (2) the statute of limitations should not apply, (3) Vidlak resubmitted herself to the trial court’s jurisdiction, (4) Vidlak was given fair notice, thus serving the purpose of Rule 65 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, (5) the pleadings taken as a whole clearly identified Vidlak, and (6) the end result in a single defendant case results in an immediate dismissal which violates the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Based upon the rationale expressed herein, we reverse and render the judgment the trial court should have rendered; in all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

On July 13, 1995, while Vidlak was driving a car that had been owned by Reuben Stewart, deceased, she was involved in an accident with a car driven by Green. On May 22, 1997, Green filed suit against Vidlak for personal injuries sustained in the accident. The case was set for trial on February 12, 2001, and during a pre-trial conference on January 19, 2001, the trial court sustained Vidlak’s special exceptions. On January 22, 2001, Green filed her first amended petition omitting Vidlak as a named defendant and naming Stewart as the only defendant.

When the case was called for trial on February 12, 2001, after counsel for Green announced ready, counsel for Vidlak, without making any announcement of ready or otherwise, called the court’s attention to Green’s amended pleading naming Stewart as a defendant and omitting Vidlak as a defendant. Without filing a motion to dismiss or other motion, counsel for Vidlak argued that Green’s amended petition operated as a non-suit as to Vidlak. *fn2 After hearing argument from both counsel and reviewing authorities, on February 12, 2001, the trial court signed the following order.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center

Pennsylvania Legal Awards (PALA) 2023

June 14, 2023
TBC, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.


Learn More

Consulting Top Consultants 2023

June 15, 2023
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.


Learn More

Southeastern Legal Awards (SLA) 2023

June 22, 2023
TBC

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts

Attorneys-Solicitor General Division


Attorneys Solicitor General Division: The West Virginia Attorney General's Office is accepting applications for attorneys in the Solicitor...


Apply Now ›

CIVIL LITIGATION ATTORNEY -NEW YORK


Regional mid-sized firm with diverse civil litigation practice seeking hardworking and dedicated attorneys with 1-5 years experience for it...


Apply Now ›

LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEY - NEW YORK


AV-rated Garden City, NY law firm seeks attorney with 5+ years' experience for firm's labor & employment department. Prior experience ne...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs

POND LEHOCKY STERN GIORDANO

06/06/2023
TLI Web

Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP would like to announce that....


View Announcement ›

HARTMANN DOHERTY ROSA BERMAN & BULBULIA LLC

06/05/2023
NJLJ Web

HARTMANN DOHERTY ROSA BERMAN & BULBULIA LLC's Matrimonial & Family Practice Warmly Welcomes the Honorable Peter J. Melchionne (Ret.) to Lead its New Family Law Dispute Resolution Team.


View Announcement ›

GIBBONS PC

06/05/2023
NJLJ Web

Gibbons PC would like to announce that...


View Announcement ›
Go to Professional Announcements

Legal Newswire

Winning Strategies: Anna Osipov’s Journey to Establishing Osipov Legal Group L...
IMS Consulting & Expert Services Acquires Nationally Recognized Tsongas Litigati...
CHAMBERS USA 2023 RANKS SOUTHBANK LEGAL AMONG THE TOP BANDS FOR COMMERCIAL LITI...
CHAMBERS USA 2023 RANKS IFRAH LAW AND FIRM PARTNERS AMONG THE TOP BANDS FOR GAMI...
Submit a press release