X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
This case involves a dispute between appellee Ronald Simon and his former law firm, Connerton, Ray & Simon, *fn1 over compensation allegedly due Simon after he left the firm. As required by his partnership agreement, Simon sought resolution of the dispute by initiating an arbitration proceeding. After prolonged delays, the arbitrator issued a decision in favor of appellants. Simon filed a motion to vacate the arbitration award; appellants filed a cross-motion to confirm the award. Following a hearing, the trial court granted Simon’s motion to vacate the award, denied appellants’ motion to confirm, and ordered a rehearing to be held before a new arbitrator. From that order appellants noted this appeal. Simon moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We agree with Simon that we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal and must dismiss it.

As a general rule, orders that facilitate resolution of disputes through arbitration are not appealable, but orders that frustrate such are appealable. *fn2 That principle is reflected in D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a) (2001), pursuant to which certain arbitration-related orders are deemed final for purposes of appeal. Of relevance here, D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a)(3) deems final those orders confirming or denying confirmation of an arbitration award, and D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a)(5) deems final those orders “vacating an award without directing a rehearing.”

The order appealed in this case denied appellants’ motion to confirm the award, which suggests it might be appealable under D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a)(3), but it also vacated the award and directed the parties to essentially begin arbitration anew. If we were to hold the order appealable simply because it in part denied confirmation of an award, D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a)(5) would be rendered superfluous, since any vacatur of an arbitration award would then be appealable as a denial of confirmation. But D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a)(5) specifies that only orders vacating an arbitration award “without directing a rehearing” are final. “A basic principle [of statutory construction] is that each provision of the statute should be construed so as to give effect to all of the statute’s provisions, not rendering any provision superfluous.” *fn3 Additionally, D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a)(5) specifically addresses the jurisdictional impact of ordering a new hearing, whereas � 16-4317 (a)(3) is more general. When a statute contains potentially inconsistent provisions, the more specific provision “must govern or control, as a clearer and more definite expression of the legislative will.” *fn4 These axioms of statutory construction dictate our conclusion that D.C. Code � 16-4317 (a)(3) not be read as allowing this appeal.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now

New Jersey Legal Awards (NJLA) 2023

September 27, 2023
East Brunswick, NJ

New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.


Learn More

General Counsel Conference East 2023

October 03, 2023
Brooklyn, NY

General Counsel Conference addresses trends in regulatory, data protection, tech management, legal operations, and leadership.


Learn More

New York Legal Awards (NYLA) 2023

October 05, 2023
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More

Transactional Intellectual Property / Corporate Lawyer - CT or Remote


We are seeking a lawyer with extensive transactional intellectual property experience to join our corporate practice. Candidates should hav...


Apply Now ›

Health Law Associate CT


Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...


Apply Now ›

Mid-Level Commercial Litigation Associate -- New York


Qualifications: Admitted in New York state court and federal courts in New York. Experience practicing in commercial litigation in New Yor...


Apply Now ›

Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi

09/25/2023
New Jersey Law Journal

Prof


View Announcement ›

RIKER DANZIG SCHERER HYLAND & PERRETTI LLP

09/18/2023
New Jersey Law Journal

Riker Danzig deeply mourns the passing of our esteemed partner, dear friend and beloved colleague, Marc D'Angiolillo.


View Announcement ›

Eisenberg, Rothweiler, et.al

09/12/2023
TLI Web

Eisenberg Rothweiler


View Announcement ›