X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.

Morgan’s Foods, Inc., (appellant) appeals from a final order entered in theDistrict Court [FOOTNOTE 1] for the Eastern District of Missouri denying appellant’s motion toreconsider sanctions imposed against it and its outside counsel for failure toparticipate in good faith in court-ordered alternate dispute resolution (ADR) andimposing additional sanctions for vexatiously increasing the costs of litigation. SeeNick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 99 F. Supp. 2d 1056, 1057 (E.D. Mo. 2000)(memorandum and order) (Morgan’s Foods, Inc.). Appellant is represented on appealby its chief in-house counsel. Appellant’s outside counsel is not a party to this appealand does not represent appellant in this appeal. For reversal appellant argues that thedistrict court abused its discretion by sanctioning appellant because (1) the sanctionwas not authorized under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) or the inherent power doctrine;(2) fines payable to the court are not available under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); and (3) theuncontroverted facts establish that appellant’s outside counsel was solely responsiblefor violating the court order and failing to participate in good faith in ADR. For thereasons discussed below, we hold that the district court acted within its discretion andwe therefore affirm the district court’s order denying the motion for reconsiderationand imposing additional sanctions.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
June 20, 2024
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
June 27, 2024
New York

Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.


Learn More
July 11, 2024
New York, NY

The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.


Learn More

We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...


Apply Now ›

McCarter & English, LLP is seeking an litigation attorney for our Miami, FL office. Candidate must have 3-6 years of law firm experience...


Apply Now ›

Harwood Lloyd, LLC of Hackensack, NJ is seeking a full-time Attorney to join us in our Insurance Defense Department. Are you a forward-think...


Apply Now ›
04/29/2024
The National Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›