X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Petitioner Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-30′s, were the supervisors in one of respondent’s departments known as the “Hinge Room,” which wasmanaged by Russell Caldwell, 45. Reeves’ responsibilities included recording the attendance and hours worked by employees under his supervision. In1995, Caldwell informed Powe Chesnut, the company’s director of manufacturing, that Hinge Room production was down because employees were oftenabsent, coming in late, and leaving early. Because the monthly attendance reports did not indicate a problem, Chesnut ordered an audit, which, according tohis testimony, revealed numerous timekeeping errors and misrepresentations by Caldwell, Reeves, and Oswalt. Chesnut and other company officialsrecommended to the company president, Sandra Sanderson, that Reeves and Caldwell be fired, and she complied. Reeves filed this suit, contending that hehad been terminated because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). At trial, respondent contended Reeveshad been fired due to his failure to maintain accurate attendance records. Reeves attempted to demonstrate that this explanation was pretext for agediscrimination, introducing evidence that he had accurately recorded the attendance and hours of the employees he supervised, and that Chesnut, whomOswalt described as wielding “absolute power” within the company, had demonstrated age-based animus in his dealings with him. The District Court deniedrespondent’s motions for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50, and the case went to the jury, which returned a verdict forReeves. The Fifth Circuit reversed. Although recognizing that Reeves may well have offered sufficient evidence for the jury to have found that respondent’sexplanation was pretextual, the court explained that this did not mean that Reeves had presented sufficient evidence to show that he had been fired becauseof his age. In finding the evidence insufficient, the court weighed the additional evidence of discrimination introduced by Reeves against other circumstancessurrounding his discharge, including that Chesnut’s age-based comments were not made in the direct context of Reeves’ termination; there was no allegationthat the other individuals who recommended his firing were motivated by age; two of those officials were over 50; all three Hinge Room supervisors wereaccused of inaccurate recordkeeping; and several of respondent’s managers were over 50 when Reeves was fired.

Held:

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now

Women, Influence & Power in Law UK Awards 2024

March 06, 2024
London, UK

Women, Influence & Power in Law UK Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More

Florida Legal Awards (FLLA) 2024

April 04, 2024
Miami, FL

Daily Business Review honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Florida.


Learn More

Consulting Rising Stars of the Profession 2024

April 11, 2024
Chicago, IL

Consulting magazine is proud to recognize this unique group of movers and shakers at our annual Rising Stars of Profession awards.


Learn More

Associate Attorney


Seeking Estate Administration Attorney for busy boutique office. Huge upside potential and growth opportunity.NYS Bar Admission and relevan...


Apply Now ›

San Francisco Employment Litigation Associate (Mid-Level)


Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the San Francisco, CA office for an associate in our Labor & Employment Department. Th...


Apply Now ›

San Francisco - Labor and Employment Associate


Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the San Francisco, CA office for an associate in our Labor & Employment Department. Th...


Apply Now ›

Danaher Lagnese, PC

02/22/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›

Blume Forte Fried Zerres & Molinari

02/19/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Frederick D. Miceli has joined the firm as Of Counsel


View Announcement ›

BENCHMARK RESOLUTION SERVICES, LLC

01/29/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›