In a case that presented two judges with the thorny question of whether to recuse themselves after they had begun working on the matter, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Nov. 29 threw out a settlement between freelancers and media companies that reprinted their works in electronic databases.

The circuit ruled 2-1 that Southern District Judge George Daniels did not have jurisdiction to preside over the case because the vast majority of participants in the freelancer class failed to register copyrights in their works.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]