In a decision evaluating a coupon settlement under provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, U.S. District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga of the Southern District of Florida declined to give final approval to the parties’ Third Amended Settlement Agreement. See Figueroa v. Sharper Image Corp., 2007 WL 2979285 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2007). In a lengthy opinion, Altonaga emphasized the congressional intent that coupon settlements post-CAFA be subjected to heightened judicial scrutiny.

The Figueroa decision also reflects the powerful role that objectors play in final approval of class action settlements in a post-CAFA world. Of particular note, 35 state attorneys general and several individual objectors repeatedly challenged the settlement agreements. The objectors’ persistence, and the substance of their criticisms, convinced Altonaga that the Figueroa settlement did not satisfy standards for final settlement approval.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]