It's a defense lawyer's dream evidence: a biomechanical engineer's testimony -- based on simulated accidents with human beings as test subjects -- that a fender-bender could not have caused the injuries the plaintiff says it did. The question is whether it's science or pseudoscience. That's what New Jersey's Supreme Court is puzzling over in a case argued Tuesday that affords the court a chance to clarify a murky area of state law.
November 15, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
It’s a defense lawyer’s dream evidence: a biomechanical engineer’s testimony — based on simulated accidents with human beings as test subjects — that a fender-bender could not have caused the injuries the plaintiff says it did.
The question is whether it’s science or pseudoscience. That’s what New Jersey’s Supreme Court is puzzling over in Hisenaj v. Kuehner A-86-06, argued on Tuesday.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
