Deciding whether to require attorneys to tell clients when they don't have malpractice insurance is proving extremely difficult for the California Bar Board of Governors. After a confusing and contentious discussion Friday, board members unanimously punted a controversial proposed amendment back to agency staffers and the Committee on Regulation, Admissions and Discipline to discern whether it would fly legally. State Bar governors have struggled with the issue of mandatory disclosure for more than a year.
November 13, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Deciding whether to require that attorneys tell clients when they don’t have malpractice insurance is proving extremely difficult for the California Bar Board of Governors.
After a confusing and contentious discussion Friday, board members unanimously punted a controversial proposed amendment back to agency staffers and the Committee on Regulation, Admissions and Discipline to discern whether it would fly legally.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
