The New Jersey Supreme Court has refused, for the third time, to hear two former hockey players' claims for $200 million from National Hockey League insurers for injuries suffered in a limousine accident. And the players' lawyers say the court flouted its own voting rules for certification, making the case a window on the seldom-seen workings of the state's highest tribunal.
October 29, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The New Jersey Supreme Court has refused, for the third time, to hear two former hockey players’ claims for $200 million from National Hockey League insurers for injuries in a limousine accident.
And the players’ lawyers say the court flouted its own voting rules for certification, making the case a window on the seldom-seen workings of the state’s highest tribunal.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
