An e-mail exchange between a real-estate owner and a prospective buyer cannot constitute an enforceable contract, a Queens, N.Y., judge has ruled. The decision is contrary to a 2004 ruling, Rosenfeld v. Zerneck , in which a Brooklyn Supreme Court judge ruled that such exchanges can satisfy the statute of frauds for the sale of real property.
October 17, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
An e-mail exchange between a real-estate owner and a prospective buyer cannot constitute an enforceable contract, a Queens judge has ruled.
The decision is contrary to a 2004 ruling, Rosenfeld v. Zerneck, 4 Misc. 3d 193, in which a Brooklyn Supreme Court judge ruled that such exchanges can satisfy the statute of frauds for the sale of real property.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
