The concept of an attorney accidentally obtaining an opposing lawyer’s pretrial notes and using them for his own tactical advantage seemed to leave the justices of the California Supreme Court with a bad taste in their mouths on Tuesday.

Especially when an attorney for El Segundo, Calif., lawyer Raymond Johnson argued that having access to an opponent’s work product provides a surprise factor that lets an attorney test or impeach an expert witness’ testimony.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]