In a matter of first impression for a Pennsylvania appellate court, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has taken a hard line on the inadvertent disclosure of privileged documents. See Carbis Walker, LLP v. Hill, Barth & King, LLC, ___ A.2d ___, 2007 WL 2080599, 2007 PA Super. 221 (2007). Attorneys in the midst of sometimes hectic or complicated discovery proceedings can learn a valuable lesson from the decision.

In Carbis Walker, accounting/consulting firm Carbis Walker, LLP (CW) sued rival firm Hill, Barth & King, LLC (HBK) and a former CW employee who had left for a job with HBK, and who had allegedly taken several CW clients with him. In the course of litigation, counsel for HBK inadvertently faxed a privileged document, which was intended for HBK’s local counsel, to local counsel for CW. The next day, CW’s counsel notified HBK’s counsel of the transmission of the privileged document.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]