For at least the 10th time, the Appellate Division, 1st Department, has rebuked a Manhattan Supreme Court justice for excessively interfering with the examination of witnesses during a criminal trial.

In the present case, the unanimous panel ruled that Justice Arlene R. Silverman’s “almost continuous interference” during both the defense’s and the prosecution’s questioning constituted reversible error, requiring the panel to throw out a guilty verdict in a felony drug-possession trial.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]