The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case in which a woman, despite signing a liability release, successfully brought claims against a ski resort for injuries she suffered when falling from a ski lift. A lower court panel ruled that a release form does not necessarily supersede an oral agreement between a ski lift operator and a skier to stop a lift before she boarded. One question to be briefed is whether the court erred in not concluding that such injuries are "inherent to the sport."
September 04, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case in which a woman, despite signing a liability release, successfully brought claims against a ski resort for injuries she suffered when falling from a ski lift.
The court granted allocatur Thursday in Chepkevich v. Hidden Valley Resort and offered four different issues to be briefed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
