The stakes were huge even for Johnson & Johnson, the world’s largest manufacturer of health care products.

In 2003, Applied Medical Resources Corp., which manufactures medical instruments, filed suit in the Central District of California alleging that J&J’s Ethicon Inc. subsidiary had used its position as a market leader in sutures to monopolize the market for trocars, which are devices used in minimally invasive surgery. AMR claimed $54 million in damages, arguing that J&J had violated antitrust law by offering the steepest discounts to hospitals that committed to purchase both sutures and trocars. Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. Ethicon Inc., No. SACV 03-1329 (C.D. Calif. 2006). Plaintiffs counsel Steve Susman had won a $140 million verdict in a similar case in the same court just a year earlier.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]