As the patent and technology communities continue to analyze the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent opinions pulling back on patent scope and challenging legal standards set by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) (the court of sole appellate jurisdiction over patent cases arising in federal district courts), the CAFC on July 7 released the latest assault on patent scope, a three-judge panel decision in the 19-year-old patent case Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Ltd., et al.

Festo Corp. initiated its patent-infringement lawsuit in 1988. After a trial on the merits, in 1994, the district court found infringement (Festo I). The court held that while there was no literal infringement by the defendant, SMC Pneumatic Inc.’s (SMC) device, infringement existed under the doctrine of equivalents.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]