A judge's post-trial fumble has cost the Oakland Raiders a retrial in one of the biggest lawsuits in the team's lengthy litigious history. The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that now-retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Richard Hubbell failed to comply with a state law that required him to explain his reasons for granting the Raiders a new trial in a major territorial rights suit against the NFL. As a result, the trial jury's original 2001 verdict against the Raiders stands.
July 03, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A judge’s post-trial fumble has cost the Oakland Raiders a retrial in one of the biggest lawsuits in the team’s lengthy litigious history.
The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that now-retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Richard Hubbell failed to comply with a state law that required him to explain his reasons for granting the Raiders a new trial in a major territorial rights suit against the National Football League.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
