In this era of complicated M&A activity, it may be difficult to understand the impact such transations will have on the continued availability of pre-existing insurance for new or surviving entities. Attorneys Keven Drummond Eiber and Amanda M. Leffler discuss some of the generally applicable rules, and discuss recent Ohio cases that provide new insights into the problems companies with complex corporate histories face when seeking coverage for long tail liabilities.
June 27, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Several recent cases in Ohio, following in the wake of the 2003 California decision in Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 29 Cal. 4th 934, 62 P.3d 69 (Feb. 3, 2003), provide new insights into the problems companies with complex corporate histories face when seeking coverage for long tail liabilities.
THE NATURE OF THE CORPORATE TRANSACTION MATTERS
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a full-time staff litigation attorney who has practiced between 3-5 years. Experience will include drafting motions, ...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
