A California judge dismissed a consumer class action against online DVD rental company Netflix Inc. that accused the company of inflating prices through fraudulently obtained patents, but opened the door to future claims by allowing limited discovery and the option for an amended complaint.

In the June 14 dismissal, Judge William Alsup rejected the plaintiffs’ antitrust claims because they hadn’t demonstrated that Netflix tried to enforce its patents against rivals. The patent enforcement component is a key part of claims under the Walker Process legal theory, which is based on a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that said companies’ enforcement of fraudulently obtained patents could violate Sherman Antitrust Act anti-monopolization rules. In re Netflix Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-00643 (N.D. Calif.).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]