The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has clarified the law on when a confession given after a Miranda warning is tainted by statements made by a suspect before the warning. The court addressed the problem of so-called "deliberate two-step" strategies employed by law enforcement to obtain a self-implicating statement from a suspect before a Miranda warning, and then using that statement to obtain a confession post- Miranda in United States v. Carter .
June 14, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has clarified the law on when a confession given after a Miranda warning is tainted by statements made by a suspect before the warning.
The court addressed the problem of so-called “deliberate two-step” strategies employed by law enforcement to obtain a self-implicating statement from a suspect before a Miranda warning, and then using that statement to obtain a confession post-Miranda in United States v. Carter, 05-2823-cr.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
