A 2005 Georgia statute that could force one side of litigation to pay the other side’s fees cannot be applied to a case filed before its passage, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled Monday.

The decision sidestepped questions about whether the “offer-of-judgment” rule of the 2005 tort legislation unconstitutionally impedes guarantees of access to courts or offends the state constitution because it targets only tort cases. Those questions could come up in cases over other parts of the legislation, known as SB 3, that trouble the plaintiffs bar most, including a $350,000 cap on pain and suffering damages in medical malpractice suits.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]