A New York state judge has thrown out a shareholder derivative lawsuit over stock option backdating at Bed Bath & Beyond because the plaintiffs failed to show that demanding action from the company’s board of directors would have been futile.

The decision by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Charles E. Ramos in Wandel v. Eisenberg adds New York to the list of jurisdictions where backdating suits have been rejected on such “demand futility” grounds.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]