The New York Court of Appeals has ruled that Fish & Neave acted properly when it voted to defer compensation due to partners leaving the law firm, including former managing partner W. Edward Bailey. The court's 6-0 decision was one of two the court issued Tuesday concerning lawyers and the profession. In another decision, the court ruled that a lawyer suing a company can properly conduct an ex parte interview with a former executive of that company.
May 09, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The New York Court of Appeals has ruled that law firm Fish & Neave acted properly when it voted to defer compensation due to partners leaving the firm, including former managing partner W. Edward Bailey.
Its 6-0 decision in Bailey v. Fish & Neave, 61, was one of two the court issued Tuesday concerning lawyers and the profession. In another decision, the court ruled that a lawyer suing a company can properly conduct an ex parte interview with a former executive of that company.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a full-time staff litigation attorney who has practiced between 3-5 years. Experience will include drafting motions, ...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
