The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled against two New Mexico school districts which had claimed the U.S. Department of Education unfairly deprived them of $20 million a year for their predominantly American Indian students. The Court, in a 5-4 decision that did not come out along ideological lines, rejected the districts' arguments that federal education officials deliberately shortchanged them by using the wrong public school funding formula.
April 18, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled against the Zuni and Gallup-McKinley County school districts, which had claimed the U.S. Department of Education unfairly deprived them of $20 million a year for their predominantly American Indian students.
The Court, in a 5-4 decision, rejected the northwestern New Mexico districts’ arguments that federal education officials deliberately shortchanged them by using the wrong public school funding formula.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
