A battle of footnotes in Monday’s Supreme Court global warming decision Massachusetts v. EPA makes it clearer than ever how crucial Justice Anthony Kennedy’s vote is to the outcome of big cases.

Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the five-member majority, and Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., writing for the four dissenters, crossed swords over the meaning of Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company, a completely obscure decision written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. just shy of a century ago. Holmes ruled that Georgia had standing to complain about the Tennessee company’s noxious emissions that resulted in a “wholesale destruction of forest, crops and orchards” in Georgia land just across the border from Tennessee.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]