The Supreme Court declined Monday to use a sexual harassment claim from a 16-year-old ice cream scooper in Illinois to decide whether an underage employee must show that her co-worker's attention was unwelcome. The Court also refused to consider the case of a Muslim immigrant from Afghanistan found by a jury to have suffered workplace harassment and declined to consider a dispute centered on whether Xerox Corp. improperly calculated pension benefits for employees who left the company and were later rehired.
March 20, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court declined Monday to use a sexual harassment claim from a 16-year-old ice cream scooper in Illinois to decide whether an underage employee must show that her co-worker’s attention was unwelcome.
The case stemmed from a sexual encounter between a teenager and a 25-year-old co-worker that Illinois law defines as statutory rape.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
