Wisconsin’s icy winds may seem positively tropical compared to the frigid reception some litigators received recently in a 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision issued at the end of November.

Authored by Judge Richard A. Posner, the opinion in Smoot v. Mazda Motors of America Inc., 469 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2006), shoots down a product liability claim based on a theory of res ipsa loquitur, elaborates a series of proof failures by plaintiff and her expert and lectures the lawyers for both sides about delinquencies in properly describing the basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]