Beginning in the late 1990s, employees at a paint manufacturing facility in New Jersey sued nearly 100 chemical manufacturers and distributors seeking to recover damages for diseases supposedly attributable to their occupational exposure to their chemicals.

Plaintiffs’ central legal theory: Their diseases were caused by defendants’ violation of the state common law in purportedly failing to warn their employer and the employees of alleged chemical hazards. During and after discovery many defendants paid considerable sums to settle these cases. One group of defendants, however, invoking the constitutionally predicated doctrine of federal pre-emption, obtained summary judgment and dismissal of all the plaintiffs’ claims. Bass v. Air Prods. & Chems. Inc., N.J. Super. App. Div., No. A-4542-03T (May 26, 2006), cert. denied, 907 A.2d 1014 (N.J. 2006).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]