Final approval of a proposed settlement has been denied by a federal judge in a class action against Time Warner over its selling of subscribers' personal information. A New York judge found the proposed settlement to be unfair, unreasonable and inadequate. Moreover, he held that the roughly 10.8 million potential class members would not receive the "best notice practicable" of the settlement as required, and that the proposed terms did not provide the same amount of compensation to all class members.
February 02, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Final approval of a proposed settlement has been denied by a federal judge in a class action against Time Warner over its selling of subscribers’ personal information.
Eastern District of New York Judge I. Leo Glasser, in Parker v. Time Warner Entertainment, 98-CV-42, found the proposed settlement to be unfair, unreasonable and inadequate.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
