California judges would have sole, “sound” discretion to set prison-term lengths under a bill that marks the Legislature’s first attempt to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Cunningham.

Senate Bill 40, which sailed through a policy committee hearing Tuesday, would empower judges to impose a minimum, middle or maximum sentence on criminal defendants without making the factual findings now required. The Supreme Court on Jan. 22 struck down a portion of California’s determinate sentencing law on the grounds that juries, not judges, must determine facts that could trigger longer prison terms.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]