The lawyer who convinced the New Jersey Supreme Court to abandon its gag rule in attorney-ethics cases claims he was shortchanged on his court-awarded fee. Richard Gutman was back before the court Wednesday asking for the $65,822 he says he's owed for making law in the case, rather than the $25,000 the court in May said he was due. Gutman, a solo, computed his fee by reviewing what partners at some of New Jersey's biggest firms charged and factoring in his three decades of public interest law experience.
January 19, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The lawyer who convinced the New Jersey Supreme Court to abandon its gag rule in attorney-ethics cases claims he was shortchanged on his court-awarded fee.
Richard Gutman was back before the court on Wednesday asking for the $65,822 he says he is owed for making law in the case, rather than the $25,000 the court in May said he was due.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
