A trial court lacks the authority to order the production of an expert witness’s federal income tax records as part of an opposing party’s attempt to prove the expert is biased, according to a Pennsylvania Superior Court ruling.

Using the collateral order doctrine to find that the issue was appealable by a 2-1 vote, the Superior Court then determined that the discovery order didn’t have to be honored because the request was overly broad.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]