Overturning a $13.5 million jury verdict in a product liability case, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that although Pennsylvania law calls for judges to make an initial determination of whether a product is “unreasonably dangerous,” the jury must also be allowed to hear evidence relating to that risk-utility analysis before it makes its decision on liability.

In its 27-page opinion in Moyer v. United Dominion Industries Inc., a unanimous three-judge panel concluded that the trial judge had misapplied the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]