If an employer hides a video camera in the workplace, can an employee sue for invasion of privacy, even if her image was never recorded?
That’s the question the California Supreme Court agreed on Jan. 3 to consider.
If an employer hides a video camera in the workplace, can an employee sue for invasion of privacy, even if her image was never recorded? That's the question the California Supreme Court has agreed to consider, in a case that stems from a September 2003 lawsuit brought by two women who found a working video camera hidden in their shared office. Their employer had installed the camera after a technician reported that someone was downloading pornographic images on a computer in that room at night.
January 08, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
If an employer hides a video camera in the workplace, can an employee sue for invasion of privacy, even if her image was never recorded?
That’s the question the California Supreme Court agreed on Jan. 3 to consider.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS