A New Jersey appeals court on Dec. 12 ruled that a lawyer must answer to a grand jury about his advice to the founders of a social club that turned out to be an illegal gambling hall.
In a case of first impression in the state, the Appellate Division held that a judge’s reliance on a prosecutor’s ex parte certification to sustain a grand jury subpoena, without sharing the document with the recipient, did not render the subpoena invalid.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]