An indignant Department of Justice told a federal judge Dec. 14 that the rationale for approving two telecommunications megamergers was not concocted from unfounded assumptions, as opponents of the deals suggested in court.

SBC Communications Inc.’s takeover of AT&T Corp. to form AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.’s merger with MCI Inc. have been consummated, but final federal approvals remain mired in a protracted court hearing before a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C. Both transactions must be approved by a federal judge because the DOJ’s antitrust division found that both posed threats to competition and negotiated settlements with the companies to address them.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]