Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

An indignant Department of Justice told a federal judge Dec. 14 that the rationale for approving two telecommunications megamergers was not concocted from unfounded assumptions, as opponents of the deals suggested in court.

SBC Communications Inc.’s takeover of AT&T Corp. to form AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.’s merger with MCI Inc. have been consummated, but final federal approvals remain mired in a protracted court hearing before a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C. Both transactions must be approved by a federal judge because the DOJ’s antitrust division found that both posed threats to competition and negotiated settlements with the companies to address them.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.