This summer, Melissa Baily convinced a judge to toss a patent case filed against her client, Flagstar Bancorp. It was Baily’s first victory as lead counsel in a patent case, but that’s only part of the story. The summary judgment ruling obtained by Baily, a sixth-year associate at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges in San Francisco, did more than just strike a severe blow to Eon-Net, a notorious patent-holding company. The ruling also puts so-called patent trolls on notice: Sending out generic infringement letters may be a tactic on its way out.
Based in the British Virgin Islands, Eon-Net is run by an evangelical minister-cum-inventor, who holds several patents (including one on a device for collecting “canine waste”). In March 2005 the company filed a patent suit in New Jersey against Flagstar, a $16 billion savings bank based in Michigan. The bank was one of 32 companies sued separately by Eon-Net for infringing a patent that, the company claims, covers technology that allows online shoppers to enter information into Web sites and have it transferred to the Web retailer’s computer. Eon-Net, which also has pending litigation against JetBlue Airways and Liz Claiborne Inc., had successfully extracted settlement money from ING Bank and Sony Corp. over the same patent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]