In an apparent first for Pennsylvania appellate courts, a Superior Court panel has ruled that a claim for “civil aiding and abetting” should have been applicable in a Delaware County action Sovereign Bank filed against a man accused of helping a bank employee embezzle hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Those involved in Sovereign Bank v. Valentino said that while it is clear that other Pennsylvania courts have handed down decisions that recognize “concerted tortious action” as a viable civil cause of action in the state, no court has yet gone so far as to conclude that that cause of action should have been applicable in a civil matter.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]