Should plaintiffs lawyers have to name a specific executive with fraudulent intent in order to proceed with a shareholder securities fraud suit against the company, or is it enough to hold a firm to account if any employee had the requisite guilty knowledge?

Federal appeals courts have conflicting opinions about whether fraudulent intent must be determined by the state of mind of individual corporate officials or whether the collective knowledge of a corporation’s employees will suffice.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]