An employer that was ordered by an arbitrator to reinstate an employee had the right to immediately fire the worker a second time after giving him back pay because the second firing was premised on conduct never addressed in the arbitration, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

In United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1776 v. Excel Corp., a unanimous three-judge panel held that Jose Diaz was “effectively reinstated” by the payment of back pay and that Excel had therefore fully honored the arbitrator’s decision and was not barred from firing Diaz a second time for conduct the arbitrator had never considered.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]