Legislative immunity does not protect a Pennsylvania state representative and the Democratic House Caucus from being sued by a whistleblower who claims she was fired for refusing to lie under oath, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

In Fowler-Nash v. The Democratic Caucus, a unanimous three-judge panel rejected the argument that plaintiff Amy Fowler-Nash’s suit was barred by absolute legislative immunity because she had worked as a legislative assistant, and that her firing was therefore “within the sphere of legitimate legislative authority.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]