Mothers Against Drunk Driving, in seeking reinstatement of a record $105 million verdict against Giants Stadium vendors, wants courts in dram shop cases to allow evidence that goes beyond whether a particular patron was served while drunk.
Juries should be able to know whether a liquor establishment permitted a “culture of intoxication,” MADD says in an amicus application to the New Jersey Supreme Court made public on Monday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]