Mothers Against Drunk Driving, in seeking reinstatement of a record $105 million verdict against Giants Stadium vendors, wants courts in dram shop cases to allow evidence that goes beyond whether a particular patron was served while drunk.

Juries should be able to know whether a liquor establishment permitted a “culture of intoxication,” MADD says in an amicus application to the New Jersey Supreme Court made public on Monday.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]