Mothers Against Drunk Driving, in seeking reinstatement of a record $105 million verdict against Giants Stadium vendors, wants courts in dram shop cases to allow evidence that goes beyond whether a particular patron was served while drunk. Juries should be able to know whether a liquor establishment permitted a "culture of intoxication," MADD says in an amicus application to the New Jersey Supreme Court made public on Monday.
November 07, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Mothers Against Drunk Driving, in seeking reinstatement of a record $105 million verdict against Giants Stadium vendors, wants courts in dram shop cases to allow evidence that goes beyond whether a particular patron was served while drunk.
Juries should be able to know whether a liquor establishment permitted a “culture of intoxication,” MADD says in an amicus application to the New Jersey Supreme Court made public on Monday.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
