The Supreme Court’s long-awaited oral argument in the “Big Tobacco” punitive damages case appeared to fizzle on Tuesday, with several justices hinting that they’d like to kick the case back to the Oregon Supreme Court for clarification.

Instead of delving deeply into the contentious debate over the constitutionality of high punitive damages in the context of tobacco litigation, the justices seemed troubled over more technical matters during hourlong arguments in Philip Morris USA v. Williams.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]