The Bauhaus school of architecture famously preached that “less is more,” but the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has now taken that one step beyond, finding that in statutory construction, the word “less” sometimes actually means “more.”

Following the lead of three other circuits, a unanimous panel of the 3rd Circuit held last week that a key provision of the Class Action Fairness Act includes a “typographical error” in which Congress accidentally used the word less when it meant to say more.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]