Most of the class action tobacco suits focus on the diseases it causes. But a suit in federal court in Philadelphia adds a new twist: It’s a consumer suit brought by Pennsylvania purchasers of snuff and chewing tobacco who complain that the leading manufacturer used its monopoly power to drive up prices.

In the suit, Hunt v. United States Tobacco Co., the plaintiffs are seeking to capitalize on a massive verdict against the nation’s No. 1 snuff maker, in which a Kentucky federal court jury awarded $350 million to rival Conwood Co. — an award that was automatically trebled to $1.05 billion and later upheld by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]