In products liability cases where the failure of the product is “so manifest” that “common experience” would show it could not occur in the absence of some defect, juries must be given a res ipsa loquitur instruction that allows them to infer the existence of a defect even in the absence of a reasonable alternative design, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

In Knoster v. Ford Motor Co., the court voted 2-1 to order a new trial in a suit over a fatal accident in which the plaintiffs claimed that a Ford Taurus suddenly accelerated due to a malfunction in the cruise control system.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]