The Supreme Court has moved closer toward re-examining one of the biggest and hoariest precedents in antitrust law, known to law students everywhere as the Dr. Miles rule. Under that rule, established in a 1911 case, minimum prices manufacturers set on what dealers can charge customers are deemed as illegal per se under the Sherman Act. The rule has come under increasing attack in recent years, and the Court has just issued a stay of judgment in a case that squarely challenges it.
September 08, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court has moved closer toward re-examining one of the biggest and hoariest precedents in antitrust law, known to law students everywhere as the Dr. Miles rule.
In an order released Aug. 28, the Court issued a stay of a judgment of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case that squarely tests the Dr. Miles precedent.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
