The California Supreme Court gave criminal defendants the nod to speak freely during mental competency exams without fear that their words would come back to haunt them later on at trial.

In Thursday’s majority opinion authored by Justice Joyce Kennard, four of the justices grappled with how to give defendants “blanket use immunity” without creating an incentive for them to tell outright lies during competency interviews.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]