Whatever sympathy judges may hold for lawyers feeling unfairly taxed to help doctors pay exorbitant malpractice insurance premiums, it is no constitutional concern, a New Jersey appeals court says. But the State Bar Association has decided to continue its fight against the state's $75 annual assessment on lawyers to finance a physician-assistance fund. After the Appellate Division affirmed dismissal of its suit, the Bar's board of trustees decided to petition the state Supreme Court for certification.
August 02, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Whatever sympathy judges may hold for lawyers feeling unfairly taxed to help doctors pay exorbitant malpractice insurance premiums, it is no constitutional concern, a New Jersey appeals court says.
But the State Bar Association has decided to continue its fight against the state’s $75 annual assessment on lawyers to finance a physician-assistance fund.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
